- Main Page
- Information on the Institution
- General Description of the Institution
- Address of İzmir University of Economics
- Academic Authorities
- Academic Calendar
- Recognition of Prior Learning
- Recognition of Study Abroad
- List of Programs Offered
- General Admission Requirements
- General Registration Procedures
- ECTS Credit Allocation
- Grading
- Arrangements for Academic Guidance
- Internationalization
- Institutional ECTS Coordinator
- Departmental Erasmus Coordinators
- Degree Programs
- International Relations and European Union
- Qualification Awarded
- Level of Qualification
- Specific Admission Requirements
- Qualification Requirements and Regulations
- Recognition of Prior Learning
- Profile of the Program
- Program Outcomes
- Course & Program Outcomes Matrix
- Occupational Profiles of Graduates
- Access to Further Studies
- Program Structure
- Course Structure Diagram with Credits
- Exam Regulations & Assessment & Grading
- Graduation Requirements
- Mode of Study
- Program Director (or Equivalent)
- Evaluation Questionnaires
- Courses
- General Information For Students
- About İzmir
- Cost of Living
- Accommodation
- Meals
- Medical Facilities
- Facilities for Special Needs Students
- Career Guidance Center
- Insurance
- Financial Support for Students
- Registrar's Office
- Learning Facilities
- International Programs
- Practical Information for Exchange Students
- Language Courses
- Internships
- Sports and Leisure Facilities
- Student Associations
- Useful Phone Numbers
- Diploma Supplement
- Erasmus Policy Statement
- National Qualifications
- Bologna Commission
11111
COURSE INTRODUCTION AND APPLICATION INFORMATION
ireu.ieu.edu.tr
| Course Name | |
| Code | Semester | Theory (hour/week) | Application/Lab (hour/week) | Local Credits | ECTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fall/Spring |
| Prerequisites | None | |||||
| Course Language | ||||||
| Course Type | Elective | |||||
| Course Level | - | |||||
| Mode of Delivery | - | |||||
| Teaching Methods and Techniques of the Course | ||||||
| Course Coordinator | - | |||||
| Course Lecturer(s) | ||||||
| Assistant(s) | - | |||||
| Course Objectives | |
| Learning Outcomes | The students who succeeded in this course;
|
| Course Description |
|
| Core Courses | |
| Major Area Courses | X | |
| Supportive Courses | ||
| Media and Managment Skills Courses | ||
| Transferable Skill Courses |
WEEKLY SUBJECTS AND RELATED PREPARATION STUDIES
| Week | Subjects | Required Materials |
| 1 | 1 Introduction – syllabus presentation and explanation. | Syllabus and course bibliography |
| 2 | From the Euro-Mediterranean Partnership and the Partnership and Cooperation Agreements in Eastern Europe to the European Neighbourhood Policy | EMERSON, Michael and NOUTCHEVA. Gergana. 2005. “From Barcelona Process to Neighbourhood Policy: Assessments and Open Issues”, CEPS Working Document 220/March 2005. JOHANSSON-NOGUES, Elisabeth. 2004. “A ‘ring of friends’? The implications of the European Neighbourhood Policy for the Mediterranean”, Mediterranean Politics, 9(2), pp. 240-247 [Available from EBSCO]. |
| 3 | The birth of the European Neighbourhood Policy | VARWICK, Johannes and Kai Olaf LANG (eds.), 2007. European Neighbourhood Policy: Challenges for the EU Policy Towards the New Neighbours, Opladen: Barbara Budrich Publishers, pp. 15-24. European Commission. 2003. Wider Europe— Neighbourhood: A New Framework for Relations with our Eastern and Southern Neighbours, COM(2003) 104 final [Available from the instructor in the course web file]. |
| 4 | 4 ENP and EU enlargement | VARWICK, Johannes and Kai Olaf LANG (eds.), 2007. European Neighbourhood Policy: Challenges for the EU Policy Towards the New Neighbours, Opladen: Barbara Budrich Publishers, pp. 197-218. DANNREUTHER, Roland. 2006. Developing the Alternative to Enlargement: The European Neighbourhood Policy. European Foreign Affairs Review, 11, 183-201 [Available from EBSCO]. |
| 5 | The mechanisms of the ENP – a view from the European Parliament | VARWICK, Johannes and Kai Olaf LANG (eds.), 2007. European Neighbourhood Policy: Challenges for the EU Policy Towards the New Neighbours, Opladen: Barbara Budrich Publishers, pp. 49-60. |
| 6 | The possibilities for a critical analysis of ENP | Johannes VARWICK and Kai Olaf LANG (eds.), 2007. European Neighbourhood Policy: Challenges for the EU Policy Towards the New Neighbours, Opladen: Barbara Budrich Publishers, pp. 25-48. |
| 7 | ENP and EU values | VARWICK, Johannes and Kai Olaf LANG (eds.), 2007. European Neighbourhood Policy: Challenges for the EU Policy Towards the New Neighbours, Opladen: Barbara Budrich Publishers, pp. 75-102. LEINO, Päivi, and PETROV, Roman. 2009. Between ‘common values’ and competing universals—the promotion of the EU’s common values through the European Neighbourhood Policy. European Law Journal, 15(5), 654–671 [Available from EBSCO via WILEY SCIENCE]. MANNERS, I., 2010. As you like it: European Union normative power in the European Neighbourhood Policy. In: R.G. WHITMAN and S. WOLFF, eds., The European Neighbourhood Policy in perspective: context, implementation and impact, 2010, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 29-50. |
| 8 | ENP: ethics and the power of identity | VARWICK, Johannes and Kai Olaf LANG (eds.), 2007. European Neighbourhood Policy: Challenges for the EU Policy Towards the New Neighbours, Opladen: Barbara Budrich Publishers, pp. 75-102. BARBÉ, Esther and JOHANSSON-NOGUÉS, Elisabeth. 2008. The EU as a modest ‘force for good’: the European Neighbourhood Policy. International Affairs, 84(1), 81–96 [Available from EBSCO]. TONRA, B., 2010. Identity construction through the ENP: borders and boundaries, insiders and outsiders. In: R.G. WHITMAN and S. WOLFF, eds., The European Neighbourhood Policy in perspective: context, implementation and impact, 2010, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 51-72. |
| 9 | MIDTERM EXAM | |
| 10 | ENP and the Black Sea region | VARWICK, Johannes and Kai Olaf LANG (eds.), 2007. European Neighbourhood Policy: Challenges for the EU Policy Towards the New Neighbours, Opladen: Barbara Budrich Publishers, pp. 61-74. ANDREEV, Svetlozar, A., 2008. The future of European neighbourhood policy and the role of regional cooperation in the Black Sea area. Journal of Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 8(2), 93-108 [Available from EBSCO]. |
| 11 | ENP and Russia | VARWICK, Johannes and Kai Olaf LANG (eds.), 2007. European Neighbourhood Policy: Challenges for the EU Policy Towards the New Neighbours, Opladen: Barbara Budrich Publishers, pp. 61-74. De WILDE, T. and PELLON, G., 2006. The implications of the ENP on the EU-Russia ‘Strategic Partnership’. Helsinki Monitor, 17(2), 119-132 [Available from EBSCO]. HAUKKALA, H., 2010. Explaining Russian reactions to the European Neighbourhood Policy. In: R.G. WHITMAN and S. WOLFF, eds., The European Neighbourhood Policy in perspective: context, implementation and impact, 2010, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 161-177. |
| 12 | ENP and conflict management in Ukraine, Moldova and the Caucasus | VARWICK, Johannes and Kai Olaf LANG (eds.), 2007. European Neighbourhood Policy: Challenges for the EU Policy Towards the New Neighbours, Opladen: Barbara Budrich Publishers, pp. 129-140. SASSE, Gwendolyn. 2009. The European Neighbourhood Policy and conflict management: a comparison of Moldova and the Caucasus. Ethnopolitics, 8(3-4), 369-386 [Available from EBSCO]. SASSE, G., 2010. The ENP and the EU’s eastern neighbours: Ukraine and Moldova as test cases. In: R.G. WHITMAN and S. WOLFF, eds., The European Neighbourhood Policy in perspective: context, implementation and impact, 2010, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 181-205. GHAZARYAN, N., 2010. The ENP and the Southern Caucasus: meeting and expectations? In: R.G. WHITMAN and S. WOLFF, eds., The European Neighbourhood Policy in perspective: context, implementation and impact, 2010, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 223-246. |
| 13 | ENP in North Africa and the Middle East | BICCHI, F., 2010. The impact of ENP on EU-North Africa relations: the good, the bad and the ugly. In: R.G. WHITMAN and S. WOLFF, eds., The European Neighbourhood Policy in perspective: context, implementation and impact, 2010, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 206-222. VARWICK, Johannes and Kai Olaf LANG (eds.), 2007. European Neighbourhood Policy: Challenges for the EU Policy Towards the New Neighbours, Opladen: Barbara Budrich Publishers, pp. 129-140. TOCCI, Nathalie. 2009. Firm in rhetoric, compromising in reality: the EU in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Ethnopolitics, 8(3-4), 387-401 [Available from EBSCO]. |
| 14 | ENP in North Africa and the Middle East | VARWICK, Johannes and Kai Olaf LANG (eds.), 2007. European Neighbourhood Policy: Challenges for the EU Policy Towards the New Neighbours, Opladen: Barbara Budrich Publishers, pp. 117-128. MISSIROLI, A., 2010. The ENP in future perspective. In: R.G. WHITMAN and S. WOLFF, eds., The European Neighbourhood Policy in perspective: context, implementation and impact, 2010, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 259-270. |
| 15 | ENP – economic and political perspectives | |
| 16 | Review of the Semester |
| Course Notes/Textbooks | Books and journal articles (see above), power point presentations |
| Suggested Readings/Materials | Databases from various relevant international, EU/NATO delegations in the region and EU institutions (e.g. European Commission, European Parliament); relevant local, European and world news sources (e.g. BBC, Reuters, France Press, Deutsche Welle, Financial Times, EUobserver.com, updated versions of the European Neighbourhood Policy website at http://ec.europa.eu/world/enp/indexen.htm). |
EVALUATION SYSTEM
| Semester Activities | Number | Weigthing |
| Participation | 1 | 10 |
| Laboratory / Application | ||
| Field Work | ||
| Quizzes / Studio Critiques | ||
| Portfolio | ||
| Homework / Assignments | ||
| Presentation / Jury | ||
| Project | ||
| Seminar / Workshop | 1 | 20 |
| Oral Exam | ||
| Midterm | 1 | 30 |
| Final Exam | 1 | 40 |
| Total |
| Weighting of Semester Activities on the Final Grade | 3 | 60 |
| Weighting of End-of-Semester Activities on the Final Grade | 1 | 40 |
| Total |
ECTS / WORKLOAD TABLE
| Semester Activities | Number | Duration (Hours) | Workload |
|---|---|---|---|
| Course Hours (Including exam week: 16 x total hours) | 16 | 3 | 48 |
| Laboratory / Application Hours (Including exam week: 16 x total hours) | 16 | ||
| Study Hours Out of Class | 14 | 3 | |
| Field Work | |||
| Quizzes / Studio Critiques | |||
| Portfolio | |||
| Homework / Assignments | |||
| Presentation / Jury | 1 | 5 | |
| Project | |||
| Seminar / Workshop | 1 | ||
| Oral Exam | |||
| Midterms | 1 | 12 | |
| Final Exams | 1 | 23 | |
| Total | 130 |
COURSE LEARNING OUTCOMES AND PROGRAM QUALIFICATIONS RELATIONSHIP
| # | Program Competencies/Outcomes | * Contribution Level | ||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | To be able to use the advanced theoretical and practical knowledge that the graduates have acquired in the areas of international relations | X | ||||
| 2 | To be able to examine, interpret data and assess concepts and ideas with the scientific methods in the area of international relations/political science | X | ||||
| 3 | To take the responsibility as a group team member and as an individual to solve unforeseen and multidimensional problems that are unforeseen in practice | X | ||||
| 4 | To be able to recognize regional and global issues/problems, and to be able to develop solutions based on research and scientific evidence | X | ||||
| 5 | To be able to assess the acquired knowledge and skills in the area of international relations/political science critically and to detect learning requirements and to guide learning. | X | ||||
| 6 | To be able to inform authorities and institutions in the area of international relations; to be able to transfer ideas and proposals supported by quantitative and qualitative data about the problems verbally and in writing to experts and nonexperts. | X | ||||
| 7 | To be able to interpret theoretical debates regarding relations among factors in global politics such as structures, institutions and culture, to be able to pinpoint the continuities and changes of main dynamics of international relations, | X | ||||
| 8 | To be able to distinguish the differences between the classical and contemporary theories and to assess their relationship, | X | ||||
| 9 | To be able to make use of other disciplines that international relations are based upon (political science, law, economics, sociology, psychology, etc.) and to have the basic knowledge of these disciplines. | X | ||||
| 10 | To be able to keep abreast of current news on international relations, learn a foreign language and to communicate with one’s peers (European language portfolio global scale, level B1) | X | ||||
| 11 | To be able to speak a second foreign at a medium level of fluency efficiently | |||||
| 12 | To have ethical, social and scientific values in the stages throughout the processes of collecting, interpreting, disseminating and implementing data related to international relations. | X | ||||
| 13 | To be able to improve the acquired knowledge, skills and qualifications for personal and social reasons | |||||
*1 Lowest, 2 Low, 3 Average, 4 High, 5 Highest